複製兩段上來
Other teams can offer Hayward the same starting salary (13.7M, if the salary cap stays the same next year*), but are limited to smaller raises and a 4-year deal. So the total the Jazz could offer him could go as high as $78.8M over five years or $61M over four years, but another team can only offer up to four years and $58.5M, and if the Jazz were willing to match that deal, Hayward stays.
Hayward is now on an expiring contract, which means he can’t be traded past the February trade deadline. Had he been extended, he could have been included in deals leading up to the NBA Draft, but now he’s off the table if the Jazz start discussing ways to move up in an effort to land a franchise-changer in the 2014 class.
--
如果說到比賽，昨天下半場被打成這樣（下半場僅一次助攻），ty corbin 必須要負不小責任
hayward 作為 playmaker 以這一季沒有成績壓力來看，完全可以接受，而且爵士除了他也沒人能幹這活
拿 hayward 新人年最後幾場來看，狀況跟現在還滿類似
都是以 hayward 為中心來發動攻勢，watson 有先見之明，球過半場馬上交 hayward 手上
差別在當時是跑 jerry sloan 留下來的戰術，hayward 表現不俗
（圖小可點網址看原圖 http://i.imgur.com/hW5vM5T.png）
兩個球季過去，hayward 的成長不能說沒有，但仍在小幅階段，這點該歸咎在教練團上
有這樣一個好機會，經驗能大量吸收，我想就算今年記錄再難看，都值得全力把 hayward 練起來
雖然是輸球，但我其實不認為這三場球很難看，這兩三年再爛的比賽，爵士迷都見過了
--
我認為會驅使 hayward 離開的最大原因，在於教練
hayward 太乖了，霸凌教練或者連 jerry sloan 下達戰術都可以不跑的 guts，hayward 拿不出來
爵士早該讓 hayward 第二年就像現在這樣打，別說成就，以進度看，至少會跟 paul george 同期甚至超前
現在看起來像荒廢兩個球季，也晚了 george 一年，溜馬連重建都沒有，連年進季後賽成績也越打越好
frank vogel 同樣 2010 球季中才出來帶隊，一樣專精防守，ty corbin 居然可以跟人家差這麼多
經典需要不斷地重播：
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu1BSViDtlk
GO JAZZ!!!